Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Riesz-product witnesses for a Hadamard-lacunary set

Statement

Let Λ be a finite subset of a positive q-Hadamard-lacunary sequence. It is a union of finitely many sets Λ1,…,Λr, with each successive ratio in Λν at least 3. For arbitrary unimodular ελ and each class, the Riesz product

Pν(x)=∏λ∈Λν(1+Re⁡(ελeλ(x)))

is nonnegative, has integral 1, and satisfies P^ν(−λ)=ελ‾/2 for λ∈Λν.

The lacunary and additive conventions are those of Hadamard-lacunary sequences and lacunary trigonometric series and Hadamard gaps bound the additive representations used in even moments.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite Λ, a ratio q>1, and unimodular numbers ελ as in the Statement.

Proof

technique · split into ratio-three classes and expand the product
1.1givenalgebra

Choose r with qr≥3 and split the original indices by residues [given, algebra] modulo r. Each resulting frequency class has successive ratio at least qr≥3. Each factor of Pν equals ∣1+ελeλ∣2/2 and is nonnegative.

2.1step 1.1algebra

On one such class, a nonempty signed sum with coefficients in [step 1.1, algebra] {−1,0,1} cannot be zero: its largest frequency exceeds the sum of all smaller possible frequencies, by the ratio-three geometric bound. Therefore the product expansion has constant term only when every factor contributes its 1. Its integral is consequently 1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The same largest-frequency argument says that frequency −λ in [step 1.1, step 2.1, algebra] the expansion occurs only by taking ελ‾e−λ/2 from the λ factor and 1 elsewhere. Hence P^ν(−λ)=ελ‾/2, as claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources