Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rouquier complexes satisfy far commutativity

Statement

For ∣i−j∣>1 the swaps Bi⊗RBj≅Bj⊗RBi and R(1)⊗RR(1)≅R(2) lift to degree-zero isomorphisms of complexes Fi⊗RFj≅Fj⊗RFi,Fi⊗RFj−1≅Fj−1⊗RFi,Fi−1⊗RFj−1≅Fj−1⊗RFi−1, and the same with the two factors exchanged; the signs are the Koszul signs of the total differential, and no grading shift is needed. In particular the corresponding objects of Kb(Re-grmod) are isomorphic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Indices i,j with ∣i−j∣>1 and the generator complexes Fi,Fj,Fi−1,Fj−1 of The positive and negative Rouquier generator complexes.

[F1]

Distant commutativity. There exists a degree-zero isomorphism Bi⊗RBj≅Bj⊗RBi of graded (R,R)-bimodules. Compatibility with the generator differentials will be proved below. (Distant Soergel generators commute)

[F2]

Totalization in two factors. For bounded complexes P,Q the signed tensor totalization has degree-n term ⨁r+s=nPr⊗RQs and differential d(x⊗y)=dP(x)⊗y+(−1)rx⊗dQ(y) for x∈Pr; internal degrees add, so tensoring with R(a) on either side shifts a bimodule by (a). (Bounded graded bimodule complexes and signed tensor totalization)

[F3]

The generators use Br=(R⊗RsrR)(1), multiplication εr, and ηr(1)=αr⊗1+1⊗αr, where αr=εrroot(xr−xr+1) and εrroot=(−1)r−1. (The positive and negative Rouquier generator complexes)

Proof

technique · independent coordinate blocks and the signed flip of complexes
1.1F3algebra

Put A=Q[xi,xi+1], B=Q[xj,xj+1] and let C be the polynomial ring in the remaining coordinates. The disjoint transpositions give R=A⊗QB⊗QC and Rsi=Asi⊗B⊗C, Rsj=A⊗Bsj⊗C. For E=B⊗C, the map (a⊗e)⊗(a′⊗e′)↦(a⊗a′)⊗ee′ identifies R⊗RsiR with (A⊗AsiA)⊗E; its inverse sends (a⊗a′)⊗e to (a⊗1)⊗(a′⊗e). Balancing over Asi and E verifies both maps and their inverse identities. Exchanging the blocks gives the analogous identification for j. Under these maps multiplication and root insertion act only in their own block. Thus Fiϵ=Piϵ⊗B⊗C and Fjδ=A⊗Pjδ⊗C as complexes, with the shifts inherited from the generator definitions.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

In each bidegree the map (p⊗b⊗c)⊗(a⊗q⊗d)↦pa⊗bq⊗cd identifies the balanced product with Piϵ⊗QPjδ⊗QC; the inverse sends p⊗q⊗c to (p⊗1⊗1)⊗(1⊗q⊗c). The A,B,C balancing relations verify these inverse identities and preservation of both outer actions. Each differential is a bimodule map acting in its own block, so these identifications intertwine the signed total differentials for every choice of signs, including negative cohomological degrees.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra

On the external tensor product, define the flip of a term of cohomological bidegree (p,q) by x⊗y⊗c↦(−1)pqy⊗x⊗c. It preserves both outer actions because their block labels move with the blocks. For the component dPx⊗y, its image has sign (−1)(p+1)q, which equals (−1)pq+q on the corresponding component of the target differential. For (−1)px⊗dQy, its image has sign (−1)p+p(q+1)=(−1)pq, again the target sign. It is therefore a chain isomorphism, and its square is the identity.

4.1F1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Transport this flip through the block identifications of step 2.1. It yields Fiϵ⊗RFjδ≅Fjδ⊗RFiϵ for all signs, with zero internal degree and no shift. Its component on Bi⊗RBj realizes the distant bimodule isomorphism of F1 with the required differential compatibility. This proves every displayed case in the category of complexes and hence in its homotopy category. The map is the independent-block flip, not an arbitrary flip of balanced bimodule tensors.

Remarks

The signs are exactly the Koszul signs of the total differential: the swap of two factors of bidegrees (r,s) carries (−1)rs, and this is the sign under which the two off-diagonal components of the total differential correspond. This is the trivial (mst=2) case of Rouquier Proposition 3.2 and the last line of GKS Theorem 3.10; no input beyond the distant commutativity of the Soergel generators is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources