Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Simplicial chain maps carried by specified cones are chain homotopic

Statement

Assign to each nonempty simplex σ of K a cone subcomplex Φ(σ)⊆L with a specified augmented contraction cσ. Suppose Φ(τ)⊆Φ(σ) whenever ∅≠τ⊆σ. If augmentation-preserving chain maps f,g:C∗(K)→C∗(L) are carried by Φ (their values on σ are supported in Φ(σ)), then a carried chain homotopy h satisfies f−g=∂h+h∂, with h−1=0.

Source locators

4.3.9 proof, p.119, carried induction; specialized cone version.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A specified cone contraction fills each augmented cycle. An augmented simplicial cone has an explicit chain contraction.

[F2]

The equation is the definition of chain homotopy. A chain homotopy.

Proof

Given: Nested cone carriers with specified contractions, and augmentation-preserving carried chain maps f,g.

1.1F1

Set h−1=0. For an oriented vertex s, z=f(s)−g(s) has augmentation 1−1=0. It lies in its carrier, so h0(s)=csz satisfies ∂h0(s)=z, using ∂cs+cs∂=1. Changing the sign of the generator changes h0 by the same sign.

2.1step 1.1given

Suppose h is defined through degree n−1 with ∂h+h∂=f−g there. For an oriented n-simplex s put z=f(s)−g(s)−h(∂s). The nesting of the carriers puts all summands in Cn(Φ(s)). Since f,g commute with boundary, ∂z=(f−g)(∂s)−∂h(∂s)=h∂2s=0. Here ∂2=0 is part of the given chain complexes.

3.1F1F2step 2.1∎

Define hn(s)=csz. The contraction identity gives ∂hn(s)=z−cs∂z=z, so ∂hn(s)+hn−1(∂s)=f(s)−g(s). The formula is alternating in the original oriented representative: the boundary and f,g are alternating, the already defined h is linear, and cs depends only on the underlying face. It therefore defines a homomorphism without choosing orientations on all simplices. Induction defines all degrees, carried by Φ, with the asserted identity; in degree −1 both maps are the identity on Z, so their difference is zero. This is a chain homotopy by definition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources