Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Boundary on relative chains

Statement

For A⊆X, the singular boundary induces homomorphisms ∂ˉn:Cn(X,A;G)→Cn−1(X,A;G), and ∂ˉn−1∂ˉn=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A subspace A⊆X and a fixed abelian group G.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

Inclusion sends every singular simplex of A to the same simplex in X; its faces still have image in A. Hence ∂Cn(A;G)⊆Cn−1(A;G), so [c]↦[∂c] is well defined on the quotient.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Applying this map twice gives [∂2c]=0, since the singular boundary squares to zero.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Relative singular chain complex.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources