How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The soft-margin SVM primal attains its minimum, including the unpenalized-bias boundary
Statement
Let , let , and let be a finite labeled sample with in a real Hilbert feature space , with feature map . The soft-margin SVM primal has a finite attained minimum. At least one minimizing tuple has its weight vector in . This conclusion includes samples with only one label and does not assert uniqueness of the bias or slack variables.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sample, a real Hilbert feature space, its feature map, and .
The soft-margin primal minimizes over subject to and (Hard- and soft-margin support-vector machines with an unpenalized bias).
Projection onto a finite-dimensional subspace preserves inner products with that subspace and does not increase norm (Projection onto a finite-dimensional subspace of an arbitrary real inner-product space).
in a real inner-product space (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors).
Every finite-dimensional real inner-product space has an orthonormal basis (Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis).
A nonempty closed bounded subset of , , is compact, and every continuous real-valued function on it attains a minimum (For a nonempty subset of with , compactness, closedness and boundedness, pseudocompactness, and attainment of extrema by every continuous real-valued function are equivalent).
Proof
The tuple , , and is feasible and has objective . Every feasible objective is nonnegative, so the primal infimum lies in .
Let . For any feasible tuple, project onto using [F1]. The residual is orthogonal to every , so all sample scores and constraints are unchanged, while the norm does not increase. Thus minimizing over has the same infimum as minimizing over the full feature space.
If all labels are , then , , and is feasible with objective , which is globally minimal by step 1.1. If all labels are , then , , and gives the same conclusion.
Suppose both labels occur. Set and let be the subset of consisting of feasible tuples with objective at most . By step 1.1, is nonempty. It is closed because the constraints are continuous affine inequalities and the objective is continuous; continuity of each score follows from [F2]. Every tuple in satisfies and . Choose indices and with labels and . Their constraints and [F2] give and , so is bounded. Equip the product space with the inner product . It has finite dimension , so [F3] gives an orthonormal basis identifying it with . Hence is a nonempty closed bounded subset of that Euclidean space. By [F4], the continuous objective attains a minimum on . Any feasible tuple outside has objective greater than , whereas contains a feasible tuple of objective ; therefore this minimum is also the global primal minimum. By step 1.2 it is a full-space minimizer with .
Depends on
- Hard- and soft-margin support-vector machines with an unpenalized bias
- Projection onto a finite-dimensional subspace of an arbitrary real inner-product space
- Cauchy–Schwarz: $|\langle u,v\rangle|\leq\lVert u\rVert\lVert v\rVert$, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors
- For a nonempty subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with $n\ge1$, compactness, closedness and boundedness, pseudocompactness, and attainment of extrema by every continuous real-valued function are equivalent
- Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hastie, Tibshirani, and Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd ed., corrected 12th printing (standard reference, not scraped)
- Rasmussen and Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (standard reference, not scraped)