How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The space-diagonal machine halts
Statement
Let be space constructible and suppose . The all-tapes space diagonalizer can be made total in space by stopping a simulation after its configuration bound.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the stated constructible cap and a simulated deterministic machine.
Proof
Compute in binary, enforce that cap, and run the universal simulation with a binary counter through the at most configurations allowed by the cap. The simulation uses space because .
A nonhalting deterministic run repeats a configuration before the counter expires, while a halting run is seen directly. Declare a fixed answer at expiry. The counter has bits, so it and the simulator remain within space.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sebastiaan Terwijn, Complexity Theory, §2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)