Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An explicit rational envelope for the scaled Householder QR error

Statement

Let q≥n≥1, u>0, and let κq be the local scaled-Householder coefficient of The scaled computed Householder step satisfies the local backward error premise at active row dimension q. Set βq,n=(1+κq)n−1,Cq,n=200qn. If Cq,nu<1, then βq,n≤ηq,n:=Cq,nu1−Cq,nu. Thus the QR backward-error factor can be bounded by the stated rational dimension-dependent expression in this precision range.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integers q≥n≥1, u>0, and 200qnu<1.

[F1]

For active row dimension r, the local constants are er=(1+u)r/2+3−1,dr=er+u(2+er),ar=1+u(1−u)r−1,gr=ru1−ru, cr=2((1+ar)(1+u)2(1+gr)−1),κr=max⁡{er+8dr,(1+u)cr+3u}. The scaled computed Householder step satisfies the local backward error premise

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1F1givenalgebra

Put x=qu. The precision hypothesis gives u≤1/(200q) and 0<x<1/200. Since q/2+3≤7q/2, set s=(q/2+3)u≤7x/2<7/400. The power series gives 1+u≤eu and, for 0≤z<1, ez−1=∑j≥1zj/j!≤z/(1−z). Therefore eq≤es−1≤s1−s≤1400393x<185x. Also ueq≤(9/500)u, so dq=eq+2u+ueq≤185x+1009500u≤2809500x<5710x. Hence the first branch in [F1] satisfies eq+8dq<(18/5+8⋅57/10)x<50x.

1.2F1givenalgebra

Bernoulli's inequality gives (1−u)q≥1−qu=1−x; for integer q, this follows by induction from (1−u)(1−qu)=1−(q+1)u+qu2≥1−(q+1)u. Since u≤1/200 and x≤1/200, (1+u)3≤1+4u by expansion, and (1−x)−2≤1+3x because (1+3x)(1−x)2−1=x(1−5x+3x2)≥0. Thus (1+aq)(1+u)2(1+gq)≤(1+u)3(1−x)2≤(1+4u)(1+3x). As u≤x and u≤1/200, the last expression minus 1 is at most 4x+3x+12ux≤(7+3/50)x<8x. Consequently cq<16x and (1+u)cq+3u<(16+16/200+3)x<20x. Both branches in [F1] are therefore bounded by 50x, so κq≤50qu.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2givenalgebra∎

Put t=Cq,nu<1 and y=nκq. Step 1.2 gives 0≤y≤50qnu=t/4<1/4. Since (1+κq)n≤ey and ey−1≤y/(1−y) by the same power-series estimate as in step 1.1, βq,n≤y1−y≤t/41−t/4=t4−t≤t1−t=ηq,n. This proves the stated rational envelope.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources