Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

State-equivalent DFA states stay equivalent after every input word

Statement

For every DFA D, the state-equivalence relation D of The right language of a DFA state and state equivalence is an equivalence relation on the state set, and for every word uΣ, pDq    δ(p,u)Dδ(q,u).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A DFA D=(Q,Σ,δ,q0,F) with extended transition function δ.

[L1]

By The right language of a DFA state and state equivalence, pDq means that for every continuation wΣ one has δ(p,w)F if and only if δ(q,w)F.

[L2]

By Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set A/, a relation is an equivalence relation exactly when it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.

[L3]

By The extended transition function of a DFA, δ(s,ε)=s and δ(s,va)=δ(δ(s,v),a) for every state s, word v, and letter a.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Equality of right languages is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, so [L1] and [L2] show that D is an equivalence relation on Q.

L1L2given
1.2

Fix a letter aΣ. If pDq, then induction on v using [L3] gives δ(δ(p,a),v)=δ(p,av) and δ(δ(q,a),v)=δ(q,av) for every word v; applying [L1] to the continuation av therefore yields δ(p,a)Dδ(q,a).

L1L3construct
2.1

We now induct on the word u. The case u=ε is immediate from [L3]. If the claim holds for u and aΣ, then step 1.2 applied to the equivalent states δ(p,u) and δ(q,u) gives δ(p,ua)Dδ(q,ua).

L3step 1.2induction
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove both claims.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources