Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strong convexity makes a differentiable gradient strongly monotone

Statement

Let U⊆Rd be open and convex, let C⊆U be convex, and let f:U→R be differentiable. Suppose f∣C is μ-strongly convex in the strong-Jensen sense of Strong convexity for an extended-real objective, for μ>0; explicitly, for x,y∈C and 0<t<1, f((1−t)x+ty)≤(1−t)f(x)+tf(y)−μ2t(1−t)∥x−y∥22. Then for all x,y∈C, f(y)≥f(x)+⟨∇f(x),y−x⟩+μ2∥y−x∥22, and consequently ⟨∇f(x)−∇f(y),x−y⟩≥μ∥x−y∥22.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: U,C,f,μ and the strong-convexity hypothesis in the Statement.

[F1]

Strong convexity for an extended-real objective: for x,y∈dom⁡F and 0<t<1, F((1−t)x+ty)≤(1−t)F(x)+tF(y)−(μ/2)t(1−t)∥x−y∥22.

[F2]

The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a): along the segment s↦x+s(y−x), the derivative of f is ⟨∇f(x+s(y−x)),y−x⟩.

[F3]

The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn: the real Euclidean inner product is symmetric and ∥v∥22=⟨v,v⟩.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Fix x,y∈C, put d=y−x, and take 0<t<1. Since F=f on C, [F1] gives f(x+td)−f(x)t≤f(y)−f(x)−μ2(1−t)∥d∥22.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

As t↓0, [F2] makes the left side tend to ⟨∇f(x),d⟩; the right side tends to f(y)−f(x)−(μ/2)∥d∥22. The inequality persists in the limit: if the left limit exceeded the right limit, their difference would stay positive for sufficiently small t, contradicting step 1.1. Thus the first displayed conclusion follows.

3.1F3step 2.1algebra∎

Apply step 2.1 once to (x,y) and once to (y,x), then add. The function-value terms cancel and symmetry in [F3] gives ⟨∇f(x)−∇f(y),x−y⟩≥μ∥x−y∥22, proving the second conclusion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources