How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
, so the sum is the smallest linear subspace containing every
Statement
Let be a vector space over a field (Vector space over a field), let , and let be a finite family of linear subspaces of indexed by (The sum of two linear subspaces and the sum of a finite family). Write
Then
so is the smallest linear subspace of containing for every : it contains each , and it is contained in every linear subspace of that contains each .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a vector space over , a natural number , and a family of linear subspaces of indexed by .
is a linear subspace of whose elements are exactly the vectors with for every ; and a list vanishing off a single index sums to its value at (The sum of two linear subspaces and the sum of a finite family).
For , the span is a linear subspace of containing and contained in every linear subspace of containing (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span as the smallest linear subspace containing ).
A linear subspace contains by (W1) and is closed under by (W2) (Linear subspace of a vector space).
Induction on , whose elements are the von Neumann naturals with (The principle of mathematical induction, The natural numbers (von Neumann), On the order is membership: ).
Proof
Each with is contained in : given , let be the list with and for ; then for every , since each contains , and this list sums to .
A linear subspace of is closed under finite sums: for every and every list , the vector lies in . By induction on : at the sum is by (W1), and if it holds at then lies in by the inductive hypothesis and (W2).
by step 1.1, and is a linear subspace of , so the span of the union is contained in it: .
Conversely, is a linear subspace of containing the union, hence containing each ; so any list with for every takes its values in it, and step 1.2 gives . As these vectors are exactly the elements of , that yields .
The two inclusions give .
A linear subspace of contains exactly when it contains for every , so the span of the union is the smallest linear subspace containing every ; by step 3.1 the sum is that subspace.
Remarks
-
The empty family is consistent with the statement. At the union is and the sum is (The sum of two linear subspaces and the sum of a finite family), while ( is exactly the set of linear combinations of finite lists of elements of , and ), so both sides agree. This is the case that would be lost if started at .
-
What the identification buys. The left-hand side is concrete, a set of vectors one can produce; the right-hand side is a universal property, "smallest linear subspace containing all the ". Having both means the sum can be computed by exhibiting decompositions and bounded by minimality, which is how the examples on the companion page proceed.
-
This is the linear analogue of a familiar fact about subgroups. The subgroup generated by a union of subgroups is the smallest subgroup containing them all (The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups); here the sum plays that role, and no separate "generated by" notation is needed for linear subspaces because is exactly the set of linear combinations of finite lists of elements of , and already describes the span from inside.
Depends on
- The sum $U + W$ of two linear subspaces and the sum $\sum_{i<n} U_i$ of a finite family
- Linear combination of a finite list, and the span $\operatorname{span}(S)$ as the smallest linear subspace containing $S$
- Linear subspace of a vector space
- The product $g_0 g_1 \cdots g_{n-1}$ of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product ($n = 0$) equal to the identity
- Vector space over a field
- The principle of mathematical induction
- On $\mathbb{N}$ the order is membership: $m < n \iff m \in n$
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
Used by
- Every linear subspace U of a vector space V has a complement: a linear subspace W with V = U ⊕ W Corollary
- If V = bigoplus_i<n Uᵢ with every Uᵢ finite-dimensional, then V is finite-dimensional and dim_F V = ∑_i<n dim_F Uᵢ; in particular dim_F(U ⊕ W) = dim_F U + dim_F W Corollary
- Three distinct lines U₀, U₁, U₂ in F² have dim_F(U₀+U₁+U₂) = 2 while the inclusion-exclusion analogue of the dimension formula predicts 3, so the two-subspace formula does not extend Counterexample
- Internal direct sum V = bigoplus_i<n Uᵢ: the sum is everything and each summand meets the sum of the others only in 0_V Definition
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, ℝ has a Hamel basis over ℚ: there is B ⊆ ℝ such that every real is a finite ℚ-linear combination of elements of B in exactly one way, and each basis vector carries a well-defined ℚ-linear coefficient map Lemma
- The dimension formula: for finite-dimensional linear subspaces U and W of V, the subspaces U + W and U ∩ W are finite-dimensional and dim_F(U+W) + dim_F(U ∩ W) = dim_F U + dim_F W Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 51 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Linear subspace (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Linear span (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- S. Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, 4th ed. (free PDF, CC BY-NC) (standard reference, not scraped)