How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Support-character carry recursion has only simple extra standards
Statement
Let for , and set . These are integer Laurent polynomials. Put and, for , For every , there are nonnegative integers , for the labels of parity , with , such that Whenever and , the actual module is simple. If , is even, and the field is arbitrary, then . Equivalently, writing for and otherwise, with out-of-range labels interpreted as zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and loop parameter, their recurrence quantum characteristic, the support sets, and the Laurent polynomials in the Statement.
Support is formed from digits of with highest sign positive (Spencer quantum-characteristic digits and support set).
Critical standards are simple under the divided-label digit interval, all critical standards are simple in characteristic zero, all standards are simple if , and is simple if (Critical Temperley–Lieb Gram determinants in a digit unit interval).
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.
Put for , and use in identities involving it. Summing over the lower digit signs gives Indeed the positive highest exponential times the sign product minus its negative counterpart, divided by , is exactly the sum of the indicated . The lower signed sums cannot make the exponent negative, since their absolute sum is at most , while the highest contribution is at least . No zero digit contributes a factor , since the support is a set.
In positive characteristic , define by the same formula as step 1.1 using ordinary base- digits of the positive integer , and put . If with and , this formula gives times when , and times when . When , it gives . For , write The coefficients are defined recursively as follows. If , the only extra is with coefficient when . Otherwise write . If , there are no extras. If , the only extra is , with coefficient for and otherwise. If , take the extra with coefficient for and otherwise, and add the extras with coefficients . This recursion decreases and proves the displayed identity: use at the base, and at the other stages, remembering . All coefficients are nonnegative, and every extra has . In characteristic zero define and use just the base recurrence with extra .
In positive characteristic every extra of step 2.1 satisfies For an unscaled extra , the left side is . In the base case , the right side is at least . In the noncarry case, either and , making the right side at least , or , making it at least . In the carry case gives and right side ; when , is positive and even, so the right side is again at least . A scaled extra multiplies both sides of the inductive inequality for by . This proves the assertion by induction.
Suppose . Put . For with and , step 1.1 factors times if and times otherwise. If , then , omitting , including . If , write . For one gets just . For one gets and the extra with coefficient if and otherwise. For , put : step 2.1 gives , the extras with coefficients , and with coefficient if and otherwise. These are the asserted ; if two indices coincide their coefficients add. Immediate extras have and , so [F2] makes simple. The scaled extras have and satisfy the interval of [F2] by step 3.1, so are also simple; in characteristic zero use the critical clause of [F2]. If , the recurrence gives the claim and [F2] gives simplicity of every extra.
The Laurent polynomials are linearly independent over : the largest exponent of is with coefficient , so a finite nonzero combination has nonzero coefficient at its largest index. Comparing their coefficients in step 4.1, using and the out-of-range convention, proves the last identity of the Statement. Finally gives and , hence . When is even one has and in step 4.1, so its only term is and .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Robert A. Spencer, The Modular Temperley–Lieb Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)