Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Support-character carry recursion has only simple extra standards

Statement

Let χj(x)=(xj+1−x−j−1)/(x−x−1) for j≥0, and set χ−1=0. These are integer Laurent polynomials. Put F0=0 and, for M>0, FM(x)=∑m∈Supp⁡(M−1)χm(x). For every n≥1, there are nonnegative integers βn,r, for the labels 0≤r≤n of parity n, with βn,n=1, such that (x+x−1)Fn(x)=∑rβn,rFr+1(x). Whenever r<n and βn,r>0, the actual module Wn,r(K,δ) is simple. If δ=0, n>0 is even, and the field is arbitrary, then βn,0=0. Equivalently, writing d(r,m)=1 for m∈Supp⁡(r) and 0 otherwise, d(n−1,m−1)+d(n−1,m+1)=∑r≥md(r,m)βn,r, with out-of-range labels interpreted as zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field and loop parameter, their recurrence quantum characteristic, the support sets, and the Laurent polynomials in the Statement.

[F1]

Support is formed from digits of M with highest sign positive (Spencer quantum-characteristic digits and support set).

[F2]

Critical standards are simple under the divided-label digit interval, all critical standards are simple in characteristic zero, all standards are simple if ℓ=∞, and Wn,n−2 is simple if [n]δ≠0 (Critical Temperley–Lieb Gram determinants in a digit unit interval).

Proof

Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1F1givenalgebra

Put za(x)=xa+x−a for a>0, and use z0=2 in identities involving it. Summing over the lower digit signs gives FM(x)=χnrsr−1(x)∏j<r, nj>0znjsj(x). Indeed the positive highest exponential times the sign product minus its negative counterpart, divided by x−x−1, is exactly the sum of the indicated χm. The lower signed sums cannot make the exponent negative, since their absolute sum is at most sr−1, while the highest contribution is at least sr. No zero digit contributes a factor 2, since the support is a set.

2.1step 1.1constructalgebra

In positive characteristic p, define CA(y) by the same formula as step 1.1 using ordinary base-p digits of the positive integer A, and put C0=0. If A=hp+d with h≥1 and 0≤d<p, this formula gives CA(y)=χp−1(y)Ch(yp) times zd(y) when d>0, and times 1 when d=0. When 1≤A<p, it gives CA=χA−1. For A≥2, write z1CA−1=CA+∑0<B<AγA,BCB. The coefficients are defined recursively as follows. If A−1<p, the only extra is B=A−2 with coefficient 1 when B>0. Otherwise write A−1=hp+d. If d=0, there are no extras. If 1≤d≤p−2, the only extra is B=A−2, with coefficient 2 for d=1 and 1 otherwise. If d=p−1, take the extra B=A−2 with coefficient 2 for p=2 and 1 otherwise, and add the extras B=pB′ with coefficients γh+1,B′. This recursion decreases A and proves the displayed identity: use z1χj=χj+1+χj−1 at the base, and z1zd=zd+1+zd−1 at the other stages, remembering z0=2. All coefficients are nonnegative, and every extra has B≡A(mod2). In characteristic zero define CA=χA−1 and use just the base recurrence with extra B=A−2.

3.1step 2.1algebra

In positive characteristic every extra of step 2.1 satisfies A−B2<pνp(B)(p−b),b≡B/pνp(B)(modp),1≤b<p. For an unscaled extra B=A−2, the left side is 1. In the base case 1≤B≤p−2, the right side is at least 2. In the noncarry case, either d=1 and p∣B, making the right side at least p≥2, or B mod p=d−1≤p−3, making it at least 3. In the carry case p>2 gives B mod p=p−2 and right side 2; when p=2, B is positive and even, so the right side is again at least 2. A scaled extra A=p(h+1),B=pB′ multiplies both sides of the inductive inequality for (h+1,B′) by p. This proves the assertion by induction.

4.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1constructalgebra

Suppose ℓ<∞. Put Sℓ(x)=χℓ−1(x). For M=hℓ+d with h≥1 and 0≤d<ℓ, step 1.1 factors FM=Sℓ(x)Ch(xℓ) times zd(x) if d>0 and times 1 otherwise. If n<ℓ, then z1Fn=Fn+1+Fn−1, omitting F0, including n=ℓ−1. If n≥ℓ, write n=hℓ+d. For d=0 one gets just Fn+1. For 1≤d≤ℓ−2 one gets Fn+1 and the extra Fn−1 with coefficient 2 if d=1 and 1 otherwise. For d=ℓ−1, put A=h+1: step 2.1 gives Fn+1, the extras FBℓ with coefficients γA,B, and Fn−1 with coefficient 2 if ℓ=2 and 1 otherwise. These are the asserted β; if two indices coincide their coefficients add. Immediate extras have r=n−2 and ℓ∤n, so [F2] makes Wn,r simple. The scaled extras have n+1=Aℓ,r+1=Bℓ and satisfy the interval of [F2] by step 3.1, so are also simple; in characteristic zero use the critical clause of [F2]. If ℓ=∞, the recurrence z1χn−1=χn+χn−2 gives the claim and [F2] gives simplicity of every extra.

5.1F1step 1.1step 4.1algebra∎

The Laurent polynomials χm are linearly independent over Z: the largest exponent of χm is m with coefficient 1, so a finite nonzero combination has nonzero coefficient at its largest index. Comparing their coefficients in step 4.1, using z1χ0=χ1 and the out-of-range convention, proves the last identity of the Statement. Finally δ=0 gives [2]δ=0 and [1]δ=1, hence ℓ=2. When n>0 is even one has n≥ℓ and d=0 in step 4.1, so its only term is Fn+1 and βn,0=0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources