How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
N-invariants send injective G-modules to Q-acyclics
Statement
For , if is an injective -module, then is an injective -module. This assertion is choice-free. Under DC, for every . Choice-free relative version: if is a supplied injective resolution datum at and one is also supplied a cochain-homotopy equivalence from to the deleted trivial injective resolution , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The extension and injective module .
Normal-subgroup invariants have the induced quotient action (Invariants for a group extension compose).
An injective object extends maps along monomorphisms (Injective object).
Under DC, positive right derived functors vanish on injectives; group cohomology is derived invariants (Positive right derived functors vanish on injective objects, Group cohomology as a derived functor).
Relative right derived objects are the cohomology of the functor applied to the deleted complex of the named supplied injective datum (Right derived objects relative to supplied injective resolution data).
Proof
Inflate a -module to by . This leaves the underlying groups and all arrows unchanged, hence preserves exact sequences. A -map from an inflated to has image in , since acts trivially on . Conversely a -map is a -map after inclusion. These inverse correspondences prove the inflation–invariants adjunction directly.
For a -monomorphism and map , inflate both and compose into . By F2 the resulting -map extends over . Its image is -fixed, so step 1.1 turns it back into a -map extending the original. This is the defining injectivity property. It applies also to zero modules and to either trivial subgroup or quotient, and makes only one existential extension at a time.
Under DC, apply F3 to invariants for and the injective . It gives the asserted vanishing for all positive degrees; degree zero is , which need not vanish. For the relative branch, F4 identifies with the degree- cohomology after applying invariants to . The supplied cochain-homotopy equivalence remains one after applying the additive invariants functor and compares this complex with , whose positive cohomology is zero. Thus the displayed relative vanishing follows without any choice. DC is used only for the resolution-independent group-cohomology conclusion, not step 2.1 or the explicitly supplied relative comparison.
Depends on
- Invariants for a group extension compose
- Injective object
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Positive right derived functors vanish on injective objects
- Group cohomology as a derived functor
- Right derived objects relative to supplied injective resolution data
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Weibel, 6.8.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sharifi, Section 4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)