How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The sum of triangularly disjoint graded ideals is disjoint from h
Statement
Every ideal of is -graded. The sum of all ideals with also has zero intersection with , is the unique largest such ideal, and decomposes as , where are separate ideals.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The triangular decomposition and an arbitrary ideal J.
Distinct Q-degrees are distinct Cartan weights, and the zero space is the Cartan. (Contragredient algebra has a triangular decomposition).
Proof
Write as with finite support. Choose for which the distinct numbers are pairwise different. Such an exists: the product of the finitely many nonzero linear polynomials is nonzero over the infinite field , and a nonzero polynomial cannot vanish at all complex tuples (induct on the number of variables). Applying to extracts and keeps it in . Thus is graded.
If , every vector of has zero degree-zero component by step 1.1. The algebraic sum of all these ideals consists of finite sums of their vectors, so it also has zero degree-zero component. It is an ideal because bracketing distributes over a finite sum, and it contains every such ideal. This proves existence, maximality and uniqueness of .
Cartan and positive generators preserve . Bracketing a degree vector with gives degree . If this degree is zero, the result vanishes by step 2.1; if it has mixed signs it vanishes by F1; it cannot be strictly negative unless were zero or a forbidden fractional multiple of . The remaining degree is positive. Hence is stable under all generators and is an ideal. The sign-changing involution proves the negative assertion. The direct sum follows from F1.
Sources
Source comparison: Kleshchev, Lemma 1.3.2 and Theorem 1.3.3(v), pp.13–16.
Depends on
Used by
- Kac moody algebra associated to a gcm Definition
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kleshchev, Lectures on Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras — Lemma 1.3.2 and Theorem 1.3.3(v), pp.13–16 (standard reference, not scraped)