How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The translates of a block partition its orbit
Statement
Let act on , and let be a block. Then the family has pairwise equal-or-disjoint members, its union is and it is preserved by the action of . Hence is a -invariant partition of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A left action of on and a block .
A block is a nonempty subset such that for every one has either or (Blocks and block systems for a group action).
Proof
If meets , choose . Then , so [L1] gives .
By definition every point of has the form with and , and every such point lies in the translate . So .
From step 1.1, whenever the two translates meet. Thus distinct translates are disjoint.
For one has , which is again in . Hence permutes the members of , and steps 2.1 and 1.2 make it a -invariant partition of .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Conrad, Transitive Group Actions (standard reference, not scraped)