Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The twisted product is a group iff the factor set is a two-cocycle

Statement

For the multiplication

(m,g)(n,h)=(m+gn+f(g,h),gh)

on M×G, the following are equivalent:

  1. M×fG is a group with identity (0,1);
  2. f is a normalized two-cocycle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A function f:G×GM and the twisted multiplication on M×G.

[F1]

Normalized two-cocycles satisfy the cocycle and normalization equations (Normalized two-cocycle and two-coboundary).

[F2]

The twisted product uses the displayed multiplication (Twisted product extension from a two-cocycle).

Proof

technique · iff
1.1

Assume f is a normalized two-cocycle. Using the normalization equations from [F1], one checks directly from [F2] that (0,1) is a two-sided identity. The inverse of (m,g) is (g1mg1f(g,g1),g1).

F1F2givenalgebra
1.2

Still under the cocycle hypothesis, compute both products ((m,g)(n,h))(r,k) and (m,g)((n,h)(r,k)) from [F2]. Their second coordinates are both ghk, and equality of the first coordinates is exactly the cocycle equation from [F1]. So the law is associative.

F1F2algebra
1.3

Conversely, suppose the twisted law makes M×G a group with identity (0,1). Comparing (m,g)(0,1) and (0,1)(m,g) with (m,g) forces f(g,1)=f(1,g)=0. Comparing ((0,g)(0,h))(0,k) and (0,g)((0,h)(0,k)) then yields the cocycle equation. Hence f is a normalized two-cocycle.

F2givenalgebra
2.1

Step 1.2 proves the forward implication, and step 1.3 proves the reverse implication.

step 1.2step 1.3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources