How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite-dimensional vector contraction bound for one-sided Rademacher averages
Statement
Let , let be a nonempty bounded subset of , and let be -Lipschitz for one common . Let and be independent uniform signs in . Writing , the one-sided averages satisfy
Neither supremum uses an absolute value, and no condition is imposed. The bound holds for finite or infinite bounded ; all displayed suprema are finite.
Statement references
Cauchy-Schwarz for finite random variables: : supplies Cauchy–Schwarz for the finite uniform sign spaces used in the proof.
Maurer, Theorem 3 and Corollary 4, complete vector-contraction proof: proves the sharper version through a one-coordinate comparison and induction.
Lei et al., Lemma A.1, complete vector-contraction proof: gives an independent contrastive-learning application of the vector-contraction inequality.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a nonempty bounded set , a common Lipschitz constant , and the independent uniform signs in the Statement.
On a finite probability space, . Cauchy-Schwarz for finite random variables:
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.
For any , put for independent uniform signs . Expanding the finite sign average gives and . By [F1], and . If , combining and squaring these inequalities yields ; the same bound is immediate for .
Fix an index and any real function on . Averaging over gives half the sum of and , hence half the supremum over ordered pairs of . Swapping leaves unchanged and reverses the loss difference, so this ordered-pair supremum equals . By Lipschitz continuity and step 1.1, the right side is at most . For each fixed sign vector, swapping shows the supremum is unchanged if the absolute value is removed. It then separates into a sum of two suprema; symmetry of makes their expectations equal. Therefore .
For finite , define to be the expectation of the supremum with the first terms replaced by and the remaining terms equal to . Then is the left side of the Statement and is its right side. For each , condition on all signs except and the corresponding vector signs, and collect the other terms into . Step 2.1 gives . Iterating these finitely many inequalities yields .
For arbitrary bounded nonempty , the scalar sign cube has finitely many elements. Given , choose for each scalar sign vector one point of whose left-hand signed sum is within of its supremum, and let be the finite set of chosen points. Then the left average over is within of that over , while the coordinate-sign supremum over is no larger than that over . Applying step 3.1 to and letting proves the claimed inequality for . This uses only finitely many approximate choices for each .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andreas Maurer, A vector-contraction inequality for Rademacher complexities, Theorem 3 and Corollary 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Yunwen Lei, Tianbao Yang, Yiming Ying, and Ding-Xuan Zhou, Generalization Analysis for Contrastive Representation Learning, Lemma A.1 (standard reference, not scraped)