How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Verma-flag multiplicities are independent of the flag
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). If admits two finite Verma flags with corresponding multiplicities and (Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities), then for every weight . Hence the multiplicity of Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities is well defined.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, an object with two finite Verma flags and their multiplicity functions .
If is a Verma flag with factors , then in the Grothendieck group, where , and is the multiplicity; all but finitely many vanish (Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities, The Grothendieck group and character of O).
The classes , equivalently the classes , form a -basis of (Simple and standard bases of K0(O)).
Proof
The two flags give two finite expansions of the same class, and , in .
Since the standard classes form a -basis of , the coefficient of each basis element in a class is uniquely determined. Comparing the two expansions of from step 1.1 therefore gives for every weight , so the multiplicity is independent of the chosen flag.
Depends on
Used by
- Verma filtrations are not closed under quotients Counterexample
- Translation through the sl2 wall Example
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lin Chen, lecture notes (Spring 2024), Lecture 9, Proposition-Definition 2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups (18.757, Fall 2023), Sec. 23.1 (standard reference, not scraped)