How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weyl coinvariant hilbert series has order w dimension
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a finite complex reflection group, in particular a finite Weyl reflection group, with . Put , , , and let be the degrees of basic invariants. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the faithful finite reflection action, and positive invariant degrees.
Under AC, there are basic invariants, they form a regular sequence, and is finite dimensional (Reflection basic invariants form a regular sequence).
The basic invariants are algebraically independent and generate (Finite reflection invariant generators are algebraically independent).
Reynolds averaging is a graded projection onto (Finite linear invariant and coinvariant polynomial algebras).
Proof
Under the stated AC, [F1] makes multiplication by a basic invariant of degree injective on , with cokernel the next quotient. Taking finite dimensions in each degree multiplies its Hilbert series by . Monomial counting gives . Iterating therefore gives . Evaluation at gives the finite dimension .
Fix , of order dividing . On its operator satisfies . The polynomial factors over into distinct explicit roots . Lagrange polynomials for these roots give projections whose sum is identity and whose ranges are the corresponding eigenspaces: the polynomial identities hold modulo , and evaluation at proves them. Thus a finite eigenbasis exists. If its eigenvalues are , the monomial basis of shows . This is a formal identity and also converges for , since all .
On each finite-dimensional , an idempotent has the direct decomposition into its kernel and image, and its trace is its image dimension. F3 and linearity of finite matrix trace give . Summing 1.2 and using F2 yields . Multiply by and let real tend to from below. The left side tends to . The identity summand on the right tends to . Every nonidentity operator has fewer than eigenvalues equal to one: 1.2 gives diagonalizability, and faithfulness excludes the identity operator. Its remaining factors have nonzero limits, so its contribution tends to zero. Hence .
Together 1.1 and 2.1 prove the claims. For , faithfulness forces , the products are empty products equal to , and . Degree-one invariants contribute the factor and do not obstruct the strict eigenvalue-count argument for a nonidentity element, even when has a fixed subspace. The finite eigenbasis selections in step 1.2 need no choice principle; the stated AC premise discharges [F1]'s current general regularity proof.
Depends on
Used by
- The coinvariant algebra of a finite Weyl group Definition
- The coinvariant algebra of S₂ and S₃ as graded regular representations Example
- Adjoint isotypic modules have the zero-weight rank Lemma
- Complexifying a finite Coxeter reflection representation: faithfulness, complex reflections, and the hypotheses of the invariant-theory suppliers Lemma
- The basic degrees are independent of the chosen family; Hilbert series of the invariants and of the coinvariant algebra; the order formula and the Molien identity Lemma
- The coinvariant algebra is a complete intersection with one-dimensional socle Lemma
- The harmonic complement of the coinvariant algebra Lemma
- The sum of basic Weyl invariant degrees minus one counts positive roots Lemma
- Chevalley shephard todd for finite weyl groups Theorem
- The coinvariant algebra is the graded regular representation of W Theorem
- The total degree sum, the invariant Jacobian as the discriminant, anti-invariants, and the top coinvariant class Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups, §§11–13; local proof and exact reading limits in the group report (standard reference, not scraped)