Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weyl coinvariant hilbert series has order w dimension

Statement

Let WGL(V) be a finite complex reflection group, in particular a finite Weyl reflection group, with r=dimV. Put S=C[V], R=SW, I=SR+, and let d1,,dr be the degrees of basic invariants. Then Hilb(S/I,t)=i=1r(1+t++tdi1),dimC(S/I)=idi=W.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The faithful finite reflection action and positive invariant degrees.

[F1]

There are r basic invariants, they form a regular sequence, and S/I is finite dimensional (Reflection basic invariants form a regular sequence).

[F2]

The basic invariants are algebraically independent and generate R (Finite reflection invariant generators are algebraically independent).

[F3]

Reynolds averaging is a graded projection onto R (Finite linear invariant and coinvariant polynomial algebras).

Proof

1.1

By F1, multiplication by a basic invariant fi of degree di is injective on S/(f1,,fi1), with cokernel the next quotient. Taking finite dimensions in each degree multiplies its Hilbert series by 1tdi. Monomial counting gives Hilb(S,t)=(1t)r. Iterating therefore gives Hilb(S/I,t)=i(1tdi)/(1t)r=i(1+t++tdi1). Evaluation at t=1 gives the finite dimension idi.

F1given
1.2

Fix wW, of order dividing q=W. On V its operator T satisfies Tq=1. The polynomial zq1 factors over C into distinct explicit roots exp(2πia/q). Lagrange polynomials for these roots give projections whose sum is identity and whose ranges are the corresponding eigenspaces: the polynomial identities hold modulo zq1, and evaluation at T proves them. Thus a finite eigenbasis exists. If its eigenvalues are λ1,,λr, the monomial basis of S shows N0tr(wSN)tN=j(1λjt)1=det(1twV)1. This is a formal identity and also converges for t<1, since all λj=1.

given
2.1

On each finite-dimensional SN, an idempotent has the direct decomposition into its kernel and image, and its trace is its image dimension. F3 and linearity of finite matrix trace give dimRN=W1wWtr(wSN). Summing 1.2 and using F2 yields i(1tdi)1=W1wdet(1twV)1. Multiply by (1t)r and let real t tend to 1 from below. The left side tends to idi1. The identity summand on the right tends to 1/W. Every nonidentity operator has fewer than r eigenvalues equal to one: 1.2 gives diagonalizability, and faithfulness excludes the identity operator. Its remaining factors have nonzero limits, so its contribution tends to zero. Hence idi=W.

F2F3step 1.2
3.1

Together 1.1 and 2.1 prove the claims. For r=0, faithfulness forces W={1}, the products are empty products equal to 1, and S/I=C. Degree-one invariants contribute the factor 1 and do not obstruct the strict eigenvalue-count argument for a nonidentity element, even when W has a fixed subspace. Every basis selection is in a finite-dimensional space for one of finitely many operators; no AC is needed.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources