Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A distinguished triangle with zero first map is split

Statement

If X→0Y→gZ→hX[1] is distinguished, then it is isomorphic to the right rotation of a canonical split triangle, namely X→0Y→(10)Y⊕X[1]→(0  1)X[1].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A distinguished triangle whose first map is zero.

Proof

1.1given

In the left rotation Y→gZ→hX[1]→Y[1], the final arrow is zero. Exactness of T(X[1],−) therefore gives s:X[1]→Z with hs=1X[1].

2.1step 1.1given

Exactness of T(Z,−) factors 1Z−sh as gt for some t:Z→Y; exactness of T(Y,−) and f=0 give tg=1Y. Put t′=t−tsh. Since consecutive triangle maps compose to zero, hg=0; since hs=1, one obtains t′g=1, gt′=1−sh, and t′s=0.

3.1step 2.1given∎

The identities in step 2.1 show that (t′,h):Z→Y⊕X[1] and (g,s):Y⊕X[1]→Z are inverse. They intertwine all three displayed maps, so they give the claimed isomorphism of triangles.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources