How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An additive functor preserves split biproduct diagrams
Statement
If is additive and
is part of a biproduct diagram with complementary maps and , then
is again part of a biproduct diagram with complementary maps and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An additive functor and a split biproduct diagram in its source.
An additive functor preserves finite biproducts (An additive functor preserves finite biproducts).
On a biproduct, the injection-projection maps satisfy the identity-sum relation (On a biproduct, the injections and projections satisfy the identity-sum relation).
Proof
By [L1], the object is a biproduct of and with structure maps .
The displayed identities , , , , and are exactly the biproduct equations, so applying preserves them; [L2] identifies the last one as the identity-sum relation in the target.
Therefore the image diagram is again a split biproduct diagram.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.3, Lemma 12.3.7 (standard reference, not scraped)