Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An E2 page alone does not determine the abutment

Statement

There are two finite first-quadrant cohomological spectral sequences with isomorphic E2 pages and different d2, stationary pages and abutments. Thus the bigraded E2 object alone does not determine the result.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Work over k=F2 and take t=0 or 1.

[F1]

Filtered pages are the cycle/boundary subquotients, their differential sends [x] to [dx], and the next page is current-page homology (R page of the spectral sequence of a filtered complex, The filtered differential induces d r on the r page, The next page is the homology of the current page).

Proof

1.1

Define the cochain complex Ct1=kx, Ct2=ky, zero in all other degrees, with dx=ty and dy=0. Give it a decreasing filtration in which x has filtration degree zero and y degree two: FpCt1=kx for p0 and zero otherwise; FpCt2=ky for p2 and zero otherwise. Each Fp is a subcomplex. Its associated graded is k at (p,q)=(0,1),(2,0) and zero elsewhere, hence is first quadrant. To use F1's homological formulas literally, put Dn=Ctn and FaDn=FaCtn; replacing (a,b) by (p,q) gives the cohomological dr of degree (r,1r).

F1construct
2.1

The only differential raises filtration by two. Therefore it is zero on the associated graded, giving d0=0 and E1=E0. On E1, dx has no component of filtration degree one, so F1 gives d1=0 and the same two entries at E2. At page two both x and y satisfy the required cycle tests and no incoming denominator has yet killed either: a boundary hitting filtration two can first come from filtration zero at this page's differential, rather than in its existing page denominator. F1 now gives d20,1(x)=ty. All other d2 are zero.

F1step 1.1
3.1

For t=1 this is an isomorphism, so E3=0. The total complex also has an isomorphism k1k, hence H1=H2=0. For t=0, all differentials are zero on every page, and H1=kx, H2=ky. Their induced image filtrations are F0H1=H1,F1H1=0 and F0H2=F1H2=F2H2=H2,F3H2=0. These identify the stationary terms with the actual associated graded. All other degrees vanish. Thus convergence and reconstruction are explicitly verified in both cases, with finite exhaustive separated filtrations and constant-tail completeness. No representatives beyond the displayed finite bases and no choice principle are needed.

F1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources