How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An E2 page alone does not determine the abutment
Statement
There are two finite first-quadrant cohomological spectral sequences with isomorphic pages and different , stationary pages and abutments. Thus the bigraded object alone does not determine the result.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Work over and take or .
Filtered pages are the cycle/boundary subquotients, their differential sends to , and the next page is current-page homology (R page of the spectral sequence of a filtered complex, The filtered differential induces d r on the r page, The next page is the homology of the current page).
Proof
Define the cochain complex , , zero in all other degrees, with and . Give it a decreasing filtration in which has filtration degree zero and degree two: for and zero otherwise; for and zero otherwise. Each is a subcomplex. Its associated graded is at and zero elsewhere, hence is first quadrant. To use F1's homological formulas literally, put and ; replacing by gives the cohomological of degree .
The only differential raises filtration by two. Therefore it is zero on the associated graded, giving and . On , has no component of filtration degree one, so F1 gives and the same two entries at . At page two both and satisfy the required cycle tests and no incoming denominator has yet killed either: a boundary hitting filtration two can first come from filtration zero at this page's differential, rather than in its existing page denominator. F1 now gives . All other are zero.
For this is an isomorphism, so . The total complex also has an isomorphism , hence . For , all differentials are zero on every page, and , . Their induced image filtrations are and . These identify the stationary terms with the actual associated graded. All other degrees vanish. Thus convergence and reconstruction are explicitly verified in both cases, with finite exhaustive separated filtrations and constant-tail completeness. No representatives beyond the displayed finite bases and no choice principle are needed.
Depends on
Used by
- Identical E2 pages with different later differentials Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Weibel, Sections 5.2-5.5 (standard reference, not scraped)