Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-06 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

P()={}\mathcal{P}(\varnothing) = \{\varnothing\}; P(a)\varnothing \in \mathcal{P}(a) and aP(a)a \in \mathcal{P}(a); aba \subseteq b if and only if P(a)P(b)\mathcal{P}(a) \subseteq \mathcal{P}(b); P(a)=a\bigcup \mathcal{P}(a) = a; P(a)=\bigcap \mathcal{P}(a) = \varnothing; and P(ab)=P(a)P(b)\mathcal{P}(a \cap b) = \mathcal{P}(a) \cap \mathcal{P}(b) while only P(a)P(b)P(ab)\mathcal{P}(a) \cup \mathcal{P}(b) \subseteq \mathcal{P}(a \cup b) holds

Statement

For all sets aa and bb:

  • (i) P()={}\mathcal{P}(\varnothing) = \{\varnothing\};
  • (ii) P(a)\varnothing \in \mathcal{P}(a) and aP(a)a \in \mathcal{P}(a);
  • (iii) aba \subseteq b if and only if P(a)P(b)\mathcal{P}(a) \subseteq \mathcal{P}(b);
  • (iv) P(a)=a\bigcup \mathcal{P}(a) = a;
  • (v) P(a)=\bigcap \mathcal{P}(a) = \varnothing;
  • (vi) P(ab)=P(a)P(b)\mathcal{P}(a \cap b) = \mathcal{P}(a) \cap \mathcal{P}(b);
  • (vii) P(a)P(b)P(ab)\mathcal{P}(a) \cup \mathcal{P}(b) \subseteq \mathcal{P}(a \cup b);
  • (viii) the inclusion in (vii) is an equality if and only if aba \subseteq b or bab \subseteq a.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: sets aa and bb.

[L1]

zP(x)z \in \mathcal{P}(x) holds if and only if zxz \subseteq x (The power set P(x)={z:zx}\mathcal{P}(x) = \{\, z : z \subseteq x \,\}).

[L6]

x\bigcup x is the set whose elements are exactly the elements of the elements of xx (The union x\bigcup x of a set, and the binary union ab:={a,b}a \cup b := \bigcup \{a,b\}).

[L7]

For xx \neq \varnothing, x\bigcap x is the set whose elements are exactly the sets belonging to every element of xx (The intersection x\bigcap x of a nonempty set, the binary intersection ab:={a,b}a \cap b := \bigcap\{a,b\}, and disjointness).

[L10]

There is exactly one set with no elements, written \varnothing (There is exactly one set with no elements, written \varnothing).

[L11]

{x}:={x,x}\{x\} := \{x,x\}, the singleton of xx, is the set whose only element is xx (The unordered pair {x,y}\{x,y\} and the singleton {x}={x,x}\{x\} = \{x,x\}).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Claim (i): zP()z \in \mathcal{P}(\varnothing) holds exactly when zz \subseteq \varnothing, that is, when every element of zz lies in \varnothing; since \varnothing has no elements this says zz has no elements, hence z=z = \varnothing. So the elements of P()\mathcal{P}(\varnothing) are exactly \varnothing, and P()={}\mathcal{P}(\varnothing) = \{\varnothing\}.

L1L2L10L11L12
1.2

Claim (ii): a\varnothing \subseteq a and aaa \subseteq a, so both \varnothing and aa are elements of P(a)\mathcal{P}(a).

L1L3L4
1.3

Claim (iii): if aba \subseteq b and zP(a)z \in \mathcal{P}(a), then zaz \subseteq a and aba \subseteq b give zbz \subseteq b, so zP(b)z \in \mathcal{P}(b); conversely if P(a)P(b)\mathcal{P}(a) \subseteq \mathcal{P}(b) then aP(a)a \in \mathcal{P}(a), since aaa \subseteq a, so aP(b)a \in \mathcal{P}(b), which says aba \subseteq b.

L1L2L4L5
1.4

Claim (iv): zP(a)z \in \bigcup\mathcal{P}(a) holds exactly when zz belongs to some element of P(a)\mathcal{P}(a), that is, to some ss with sas \subseteq a, and any such zz lies in aa; conversely if zaz \in a then zz lies in the element aa of P(a)\mathcal{P}(a). So the two sets have the same elements.

L1L2L4L6L12
1.5

Claim (v): P(a)\varnothing \in \mathcal{P}(a), so P(a)\mathcal{P}(a) \neq \varnothing and P(a)\bigcap\mathcal{P}(a) is defined; an element of it would have to belong to every element of P(a)\mathcal{P}(a), in particular to \varnothing, which has no elements. So P(a)\bigcap\mathcal{P}(a) has no elements and equals \varnothing.

L1L3L7L10
1.6

Claim (vi): zP(ab)z \in \mathcal{P}(a \cap b) holds exactly when every element of zz lies in aba \cap b, that is, lies in aa and in bb; this is exactly zaz \subseteq a together with zbz \subseteq b, that is, zP(a)z \in \mathcal{P}(a) and zP(b)z \in \mathcal{P}(b), which is zP(a)P(b)z \in \mathcal{P}(a) \cap \mathcal{P}(b).

L1L2L9L12
1.7

Claim (vii): if zP(a)P(b)z \in \mathcal{P}(a) \cup \mathcal{P}(b) then zaz \subseteq a or zbz \subseteq b; in either case every element of zz lies in aa or in bb, hence in aba \cup b, so zP(ab)z \in \mathcal{P}(a \cup b).

L1L2L8
2.1

Claim (viii): if aba \subseteq b then the elements of aba \cup b are exactly those of bb, so zabz \subseteq a \cup b is equivalent to zbz \subseteq b and P(ab)=P(b)P(a)P(b)\mathcal{P}(a \cup b) = \mathcal{P}(b) \subseteq \mathcal{P}(a) \cup \mathcal{P}(b), which with the reverse inclusion gives equality; the case bab \subseteq a is symmetric. Conversely, if equality holds then ababa \cup b \subseteq a \cup b puts aba \cup b in P(a)P(b)\mathcal{P}(a) \cup \mathcal{P}(b), so abaa \cup b \subseteq a or abba \cup b \subseteq b, and since babb \subseteq a \cup b and aaba \subseteq a \cup b these give bab \subseteq a and aba \subseteq b respectively.

L1L2L4L5L8step 1.7
3.1

Claims (i) to (viii) are established, which is the statement.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5step 1.6step 1.7step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 16 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources