How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Blocks in a finite transitive action have a common size
Statement
Let act transitively on a finite set , and let be a block system. Then any two blocks in have the same finite cardinality. In particular, if , then is a disjoint union of finitely many copies of , so divides .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A transitive action of on a finite set and a block system .
A transitive action sends any chosen point to any other point by some element of (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
A block system is a partition of into blocks, and if is a block then every translate is again a block (Blocks and block systems for a group action).
Proof
Let . Choose and . By transitivity there is with .
Since , the two blocks and meet. Because is a partition into blocks, they are equal.
The map , , is a bijection because every group element acts bijectively on . Hence .
As and were arbitrary, all blocks in have the same size. Since the blocks are pairwise disjoint and cover the finite set , the cardinality of any block divides .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Conrad, Transitive Group Actions (standard reference, not scraped)