Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cartan commutator identities

Statement

With [A,B]=AB−(−1)∣A∣∣B∣BA for homogeneous graded operators, [LX,ιY]=ι[X,Y],[LX,LY]=L[X,Y],ιXιY+ιYιX=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The manifolds, forms, vector fields, maps, and coordinates explicitly named in the statement.

[F1]

The preceding result states that For every vector field X and differential form ω, LXω=d(ιXω)+ιX(dω). (Cartan's magic formula).

[F2]

The Lie derivative is a derivation of the tensor algebra, and its action on vector fields is LXY=[X,Y] (The Lie derivative is a derivation of the tensor algebra, The Lie derivative of a vector field equals the Lie bracket).

[F3]

Interior product is insertion into the first alternating slot and is a degree-−1 graded antiderivation (Interior product on forms is a graded antiderivation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F3

Both [LX,ιY] and ι[X,Y] are degree-−1 graded derivations, so it suffices to compare them on functions and one-forms. They vanish on functions. For a one-form α, the tensor derivation rule gives (LXα)(Y)=X(α(Y))−α(LXY)=X(α(Y))−α([X,Y]). Hence [LX,ιY]α=LX(α(Y))−(LXα)(Y)=α([X,Y])=ι[X,Y]α. The equality extends to all forms by the derivation rules.

2.1F2F3step 1.1∎

The commutator [LX,LY] is a degree-zero derivation. On a function f it is X(Yf)−Y(Xf)=[X,Y]f. On a one-form α, evaluate the commutator at a vector field Z and use the one-form formula from step 1.1 twice. The terms where X and Y differentiate α(Z) combine to [X,Y](α(Z)); the remaining terms combine by the Jacobi identity to −α([ [X,Y],Z]). This is (L[X,Y]α)(Z), proving the second identity on all forms. Finally, for any alternating form ω, (ιXιYω)(Z1,…)=ω(Y,X,Z1,…)=−ω(X,Y,Z1,…)=−(ιYιXω)(Z1,…). This proves the third identity, including degrees zero and one.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources