How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complete invariant flags are equivalent to upper-triangular matrices
Statement
Let be an ordered basis of , and put , with . Then is upper triangular if and only if every is -invariant. Equivalently, upper-triangular bases are exactly the bases adapted to complete invariant flags
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An endomorphism and an ordered basis .
Triangularisability means that the matrix of in some ordered basis is upper triangular (Triangularisable endomorphisms and simultaneous triangularisability).
A subspace is -invariant when (Invariant subspaces, restrictions, and induced quotient operators).
The -th matrix column is the coordinate column of in the ordered basis (Coordinate columns and matrices of linear maps relative to ordered bases).
Proof
If the matrix is upper triangular, its -th column has no nonzero entry below row , so ; linearity then gives for every .
Conversely, if every is invariant, then , so the -th matrix column has zero entries below row and the matrix is upper triangular; the statements include the empty flag for and the flag in dimension one.
Depends on
Used by
- Building an upper-triangular matrix from a complete invariant flag Example
- A commuting split family is simultaneously triangularisable Theorem
- If the characteristic polynomial of an endomorphism splits, some orthonormal basis makes its matrix upper triangular Theorem
- T is triangularisable iff its minimal polynomial splits iff its characteristic polynomial splits Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, 4th ed., Result 5.39 (standard reference, not scraped)