How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complexification is a functor on real vector spaces and real-linear maps
Statement
For real vector spaces and real-linear maps and , the complexification of Complexification of a real-linear map satisfies
Thus , is a functor from real vector spaces to complex vector spaces.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Real-linear maps and .
The complexification of a real-linear map is , with (Complexification of a real-linear map).
For homomorphisms of right and left modules, and (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially).
Proof
By [L2] applied with and , one has by [L1].
By [L2] applied with , and , one has by [L1].
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 are exactly the identity and composition laws of a functor.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Complexification (notes) (standard reference, not scraped)