Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ergodic averages are measurable, representative independent, and Lp contractive

Statement

Let T preserve μ. For every 1p, composition

UT[f]:=[fT]

is a well-defined linear isometry on real Lp(μ) and on complex Lp(μ;C). Consequently Sn and An define measurable Lp classes and

Anfpfp(n1).

No invertibility of T is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A measure-preserving system, 1p, an Lp class [f], and an integer n1.

[F1]

A measure-preserving map is measurable, preserves inverse-image measures, and leaves nonnegative and integrable integrals invariant (Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps).

[F3]

Complex measurable functions, their a.e. quotient, and their modulus norms are fixed by Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions; the complex quotient norm and Minkowski inequality are supplied by Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm.

[F4]

The essential supremum is the infimum of the essential bounds (The essential supremum of a measurable function with respect to a measure).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Measurability of T makes fT measurable. If f=g off the measurable null set N, then fT=gT off T1N, and μ(T1N)=μ(N)=0. Thus UT is representative independent. Pointwise composition distributes over addition and scalar multiplication, so the descended map is linear over either scalar field.

F1
1.2

For 1p<, integral invariance applied to the nonnegative measurable function fp gives fTpp=fpTdμ=fpdμ=fpp. Taking the nonnegative pth root proves equality of the norms.

F1F2F3
1.3

For p= and every finite M0, the exceptional set for fTM is T1{f>M}. Its measure equals that of {f>M}. Hence M is an essential bound for fT exactly when it is one for f, and their infima are equal.

F1F4
2.1

Iterating step 1.1 shows that every UTk[f]=[fTk] is well defined and has norm fp. Finite linear combinations therefore make Snf and Anf well-defined measurable classes.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3
3.1

The real or complex Minkowski inequality and positive homogeneity now give Anfp1nk=0n1UTkfp=fp. This includes n=1 and p=, and no inverse of T was used.

F2F3step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Ergodic partial sums, time averages, and the invariant L2 subspace.

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources