How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ergodic averages are measurable, representative independent, and Lp contractive
Statement
Let preserve . For every , composition
is a well-defined linear isometry on real and on complex . Consequently and define measurable classes and
No invertibility of is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A measure-preserving system, , an class , and an integer .
A measure-preserving map is measurable, preserves inverse-image measures, and leaves nonnegative and integrable integrals invariant (Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps).
The real norms descend to a.e. classes and satisfy the norm axioms (The norm descends to the quotient and makes a normed space for , Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including ).
Complex measurable functions, their a.e. quotient, and their modulus norms are fixed by Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions; the complex quotient norm and Minkowski inequality are supplied by Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm.
The essential supremum is the infimum of the essential bounds (The essential supremum of a measurable function with respect to a measure).
Proof
Measurability of makes measurable. If off the measurable null set , then off , and . Thus is representative independent. Pointwise composition distributes over addition and scalar multiplication, so the descended map is linear over either scalar field.
For , integral invariance applied to the nonnegative measurable function gives Taking the nonnegative th root proves equality of the norms.
For and every finite , the exceptional set for is . Its measure equals that of . Hence is an essential bound for exactly when it is one for , and their infima are equal.
Iterating step 1.1 shows that every is well defined and has norm . Finite linear combinations therefore make and well-defined measurable classes.
The real or complex Minkowski inequality and positive homogeneity now give This includes and , and no inverse of was used.
Depends on
- Ergodic partial sums, time averages, and the invariant L2 subspace
- Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps
- The $L^p$ norm descends to the quotient and makes $L^p$ a normed space for $1 \le p \le \infty$
- Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including $p = \infty$
- The essential supremum of a measurable function with respect to a measure
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm
Used by
- Ergodic averages converge in Lp on finite-measure spaces Lemma
- Maximal ergodic theorem Theorem
- Von Neumann mean ergodic theorem in L2 Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Ergodic partial sums, time averages, and the invariant L2 subspace.
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles Walkden, Ergodic Theory lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Omri Sarig, Lecture Notes on Ergodic Theory (2023) (standard reference, not scraped)