How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Evaluation modules have level zero and do not extend canonically over d
Statement
Every evaluation module has acting zero. If its finite -action is nonzero, it has no compatible action of . If the finite action is zero, every defines an extension by letting act as . In that case is a natural choice, but the relations do not determine when ; for there is exactly one endomorphism. Thus evaluation gives a module for the derived affine algebra and does not in general extend to the full affine algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An evaluation module at .
Modes act as and acts zero by Evaluation module at a nonzero loop parameter.
A full extension must satisfy by Degree derivation and full untwisted affine algebra.
The scalar central-action meaning of level, including the zero-module qualification, is Null root, central coroot, and affine level.
Proof
F1 gives the zero central action, hence level zero in F3's scalar-action sense. A proposed operator for must satisfy by F2 at mode . At mode it must satisfy . The left side is , so forces for every . Thus a nonzero finite action cannot extend.
Conversely, if , all loop and central actions are zero. For every and every , both sides of vanish; also for and for . The original loop relations already hold by F1, so this verifies every full-algebra relation. When , the operators and are distinct compatible actions, proving nonuniqueness. When its only endomorphism is zero. These computations prove both directions of the exact extension criterion and use no AC.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kleshchev, Lectures on Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras, Sections 7.1-7.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Perrin, Introduction to Kac-Moody Groups and Lie Algebras, Definition 12.2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)