How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite sharply k-transitive action has order n(n-1)...(n-k+1)
Statement
Let act sharply -transitively on a finite set of size , with . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A sharply -transitive action of on a finite set of size , with .
In a sharply -transitive action, for any two ordered -tuples of distinct points there is a unique group element carrying the first tuple to the second (Sharply k-transitive actions).
Proof
Fix one ordered -tuple of distinct points . Define by , where is the set of ordered -tuples of distinct points of .
The map is bijective: existence in [L1] makes it surjective, and uniqueness in [L1] makes it injective.
The set has choices for the first entry, then for the second, and so on down to for the last. Hence , and step 2.1 gives the same value for .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Conrad, Transitive Group Actions (standard reference, not scraped)