How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FP is contained in Sharp-P
Statement
for the page's nonnegative integer-valued function convention.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
An FP function is total, nonnegative, binary-valued, and computable in polynomial time, by The nonnegative function class FP.
A function counts accepting paths of a binary-branching polynomial-time nondeterministic machine, by Sharp-P and Gap-P functions.
Proof
On input , compute using [L1] and let . Make exactly binary nondeterministic choices, producing one path for every integer . Accept iff .
Exactly the values accept; all power-of-two padding values reject. This remains correct at , when no path accepts. The output length and hence are polynomially bounded by the running time in [L1].
The constructed machine runs in polynomial time and has accepting-path count , so by [L2].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · one level
2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arora and Barak, Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lance Fortnow, Counting Complexity (standard reference, not scraped)