Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If A has full row rank, then A+=A∗(AA∗)−1

Statement

Let F∈{R,C} and let A∈Mm×n(F) have full row rank m. Then AA∗ is invertible and

A+=A∗(AA∗)−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A matrix A∈Mm×n(F) of full row rank, where F∈{R,C}.

[L1]

If a matrix has full column rank, then its pseudoinverse is (A∗A)−1A∗ (If A has full column rank, then A+=(A∗A)−1A∗).

[L2]

Pseudoinversion commutes with adjoints: (A∗)+=(A+)∗ (Pseudoinversion is involutive, commutes with adjoints, and is equivariant under unitary left and right factors).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

Because A has full row rank, the adjoint A∗ has full column rank. Applying [L1] to A∗ gives (A∗)+=((A∗)∗A∗)−1(A∗)∗=(AA∗)−1A.

2.1L2step 1.1algebra

Taking adjoints and using [L2], A+=((A∗)+)∗=((AA∗)−1A)∗=A∗(AA∗)−1.

3.1step 2.1∎

In particular AA∗ is invertible and the displayed formula holds.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources