How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every fully faithful functor reflects isomorphisms
Statement
If is fully faithful and is an isomorphism, then is an isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A fully faithful functor and a morphism such that is invertible.
Fullness lifts every morphism between and , while faithfulness reflects equality between parallel morphisms (Faithful, full, fully faithful, essentially surjective, and split essentially surjective functors).
An isomorphism has a two-sided inverse (Isomorphism, groupoid, and connected category).
Proof
Let be the inverse of ; fullness gives with .
Then and .
Faithfulness gives and , so is an isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 9 results over 5 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)