How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hamiltonians for a fixed vector field differ by a locally constant function
Statement
If and are Hamiltonian functions for the same vector field on , then is locally constant, hence constant on each connected component. Conversely, adding a locally constant function does not change the Hamiltonian vector field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Smooth functions and the Hamiltonian convention.
A Hamiltonian for satisfies . Hamiltonian vector field and Hamiltonian function.
Proof
If both functions generate , [F1] gives . In a connected coordinate ball, integration along line segments shows that a smooth function with zero differential is constant; hence is locally constant and therefore constant on each connected component.
Conversely, if is locally constant then , so and [F1] gives .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ana Cannas da Silva, Lectures on Symplectic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)