How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Harish-Chandra projection is multiplicative on the center
Statement
For central elements , the Harish-Chandra projection from The Harish-Chandra projection satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Central elements .
Proof
By Central elements lie in the zero-weight subspace of , both and lie in . Write and with .
Put . Multiplication on either side by preserves . Moreover, if is central, then : for a term with , one has , while for a term with , centrality gives .
Using only the decomposition of , write The last two terms lie in by step 2.1; no assertion that is multiplicatively closed is needed.
Applying the projection from The Harish-Chandra projection to step 3.1 leaves exactly . Therefore .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups (standard reference, not scraped)