Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Length-energy inequality and constant-speed equality case

Statement

For every piecewise smooth curve γ:[a,b]→M with a<b, L(γ)2≤2(b−a)E(γ). Equality holds if and only if ∣γ˙∣g is constant almost everywhere, equivalently if its continuous restriction to the interior of every smooth piece is one common constant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A piecewise smooth curve on [a,b] with a<b, a finite smooth subdivision, and its nonnegative piecewise continuous speed h(t)=∣γ˙(t)∣g.

[F1]

Riemannian speed and length gives L=∫abh(t) dt, interpreted as the finite sum over the pieces, and Energy of a piecewise smooth curve gives 2E=∫abh(t)2 dt with the same convention.

[F2]

A nonnegative continuous function on a compact interval has zero Riemann integral exactly when it vanishes identically (A continuous f≥0 on [a,b] with ∫abf=0 is identically 0).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1algebra

Put ℓ=b−a>0 and c=L/ℓ. Finite additivity and ordinary integral algebra on the smooth pieces give 0≤∫ab(h−c)2=∫abh2−2c∫abh+c2ℓ=2E−L2/ℓ. Multiplying by ℓ proves L2≤2ℓE.

1.2F1algebra

Conversely, if h=c0 almost everywhere, changing finitely many breakpoint values does not affect either integral, so L=c0ℓ and 2E=c02ℓ. Hence L2=c02ℓ2=2ℓE. The same computation applies when c0=0.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

If equality holds, step 1.1 gives a zero total integral of (h−c)2. Every piece integral is nonnegative, so each is zero. On the interior of each piece, (h−c)2 is continuous; applying [F2] on compact subintervals contained in that interior gives h=c there. Thus h=c away from the finitely many breakpoints, hence almost everywhere, and it has the same constant value on every smooth piece.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2∎

Steps 2.1 and 1.2 prove both directions of the equality characterization. A constant curve has L=E=0 and realizes equality. In dimension zero every curve is locally constant, so the same case applies; dimension one is unchanged. A curve on a nonempty interval cannot have empty target. The hypothesis a<b excludes division by a zero interval length; endpoint and corner values occur on a finite set and do not alter the integrals. No point or representative is chosen from an indexed family, so the proof is choice-free.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources