Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

NPPSPACEEXP

Statement

Let PSPACE:=k1DSPACE(nk). Then NPPSPACEEXP.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The classes NP, PSPACE, and EXP.

[L1]

A language in NP has a polynomial-time verifier with polynomially bounded certificates, by The class NP via polynomial-time verifiers.

[L2]

The class notation DSPACE records deterministic polynomial-space deciders, and DTIME records deterministic time-bounded deciders, by The classes DTIME, NTIME, DSPACE, and NSPACE.

[L3]

Worst-case space counts visited tape cells and worst-case time counts executed steps, by Worst-case time and space complexity of a machine.

[L4]

EXP is the union of the classes DTIME(2nk), by The classes EXP and NEXP.

[L5]

A configuration records a machine state, head positions, and finite tape data, and tape contents have finite support, by Configurations of a deterministic one-tape Turing machine and Right-infinite tapes as finite-support functions.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

To prove NPPSPACE, let LNP. By [L1], choose a verifier for L with runtime bounded by a polynomial q(n) and certificate length bounded by a polynomial p(n). A deterministic decider for L can enumerate all certificates u of length at most p(x) in lexicographic order, run the verifier on (x,u), and accept as soon as one certificate succeeds. It stores only the input x, the current certificate u, and the verifier workspace, so the total space used is polynomial in x. Hence LPSPACE by [L2] and [L3].

L1L2L3givenconstruct
1.2

To prove PSPACEEXP, let LPSPACE. Then by definition there exists k1 and a deterministic machine M deciding L while using at most cnk tape cells on inputs of length n, for some constant c. Fix such an input length n. Because of [L5], a configuration of M is determined by one of finitely many states, the head positions on the finitely many tapes, and the contents of at most cnk visited cells. Therefore the total number of possible configurations is at most Q(cnk+1)dΓdcnk=2O(nk) for a constant d depending only on the fixed number of tapes.

L3L5given
2.1

Since M is deterministic and halts on every input, it cannot visit the same configuration twice on one accepting or rejecting run: a repeated configuration would force an infinite loop from that point onward. So the running time on inputs of length n is bounded by the number of reachable configurations from step 1.2, hence by 2O(nk). Enlarging the exponent if necessary, there exists m with 2O(nk)2nm for all sufficiently large n. Therefore LEXP by [L2] and [L4].

L2L4step 1.2
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove NPPSPACEEXP.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources