How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The coinvariants functor is right exact
Statement
If is exact in left -modules, then is exact.
Proof
Given: An exact sequence of left -modules.
The induced map is surjective because is. Let map to zero. Then the image of in is a finite sum . Choose lifts of the finitely many and put . Then maps to zero in , so it lies in the image of , while in .
Thus the image of is exactly the kernel of , and the latter map is surjective. This proves right exactness without invoking a commutative-ring tensor theorem for the possibly noncommutative group ring.
Depends on
Used by
- Group homology as a derived functor Definition
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Weibel, §6.1 (standard reference, not scraped)