Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Vector-bundle pullback is canonically functorial

Statement

For EZ and composable maps XfYgZ, there are canonical bundle isomorphisms

idZEE,f(gE)(gf)E.

They are natural in bundle maps and coherent for three composable base maps. Under them, pullback of sections respects identities and composition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The bundle and composable maps in the statement.

[F1]

Pullbacks are the indicated subspaces of products, and their canonical maps and sections have the displayed coordinate formulas (Pullback vector bundles and sections).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The maps (z,e)e and e(q(e),e) are mutually inverse fiberwise-linear continuous maps idZEE. They are continuous by the product and subspace formulas in [F1].

F1
1.2

The composite comparison is α(x,(f(x),e))=(x,e), with inverse (x,e)(x,(f(x),e)). Both maps are continuous restrictions of product-coordinate maps, are linear on each fiber, and preserve the defining equations, so [F1] makes them inverse bundle isomorphisms.

F1
2.1

For a third base map, every route through the associativity comparisons deletes the same redundant base coordinates and ends at the same pair (w,e). For a bundle map, both naturality routes apply that map to the same final e-coordinate. Thus the comparisons are coherent and natural.

F1step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

The pullback section formula sends x to (x,s(g(f(x)))) whether it is applied once along gf or twice along g and f; the identity formula similarly reduces to s. Hence sections respect identities and composition under the canonical comparisons.

F1step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources