How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Verma composition multiplicities are finite
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
For any weights , the composition multiplicity is finite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), central-character preservation A Verma composition factor has the same central character, dot-orbit classification under that Choice premise Central characters are dot-Weyl orbits, the Verma weight cone Weights of a Verma module lie below lambda, membership of Verma modules in category Verma and finite-dimensional weight modules belong to O, and the Choice-qualified finite weight-space detector Finite weight-space detection of subquotients.
Proof
The Verma module belongs to and its center acts by the scalar character , so it belongs to . A simple factor can occur only when is a weight below and , hence under the stated Choice premise . The Weyl group is finite; no Casimir bound is needed for this finite list.
The finite weight-space detector bounds the number of strict inclusions in any submodule chain of . Choose a finite chain of maximum possible length among these bounded integer lengths. If one factor were not simple, an intermediate submodule would refine it, contradicting maximality; thus this is a composition series. Taking a fixed weight is exact on these weight-module subquotients. Each occurrence of contributes its one-dimensional highest-weight space in degree ; other factors contribute a nonnegative dimension. Thus .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups, Lemma 15.9 (standard reference, not scraped)