How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Verma composition multiplicities are finite
Statement
For any weights , the composition multiplicity is finite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Central-character preservation A Verma composition factor has the same central character, dot-orbit classification Central characters are dot-Weyl orbits, Casimir scalars The quadratic Casimir eigenvalue on a highest-weight module is , and the Verma weight cone Weights of a Verma module lie below lambda.
Proof
A factor can occur only when is both a weight below and in the dot orbit fixed by its central character. The Casimir equality restricts the possible lattice differences in each bounded weight cone to a finite set.
In particular, the -weight space of is finite-dimensional and every copy of contributes its one-dimensional highest-weight line there. Therefore the multiplicity is bounded by .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups, Lemma 15.9 (standard reference, not scraped)