Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Verma composition multiplicities are finite

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

For any weights λ,μ, the composition multiplicity [M(λ):L(μ)] is finite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), central-character preservation A Verma composition factor has the same central character, dot-orbit classification under that Choice premise Central characters are dot-Weyl orbits, the Verma weight cone Weights of a Verma module lie below lambda, membership of Verma modules in category O Verma and finite-dimensional weight modules belong to O, and the Choice-qualified finite weight-space detector Finite weight-space detection of subquotients.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1given

The Verma module M(λ) belongs to O and its center acts by the scalar character χλ, so it belongs to Oχλ. A simple factor L(μ) can occur only when μ is a weight below λ and χμ=χλ, hence under the stated Choice premise μ∈W⋅λ. The Weyl group is finite; no Casimir bound is needed for this finite list.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra∎

The finite weight-space detector bounds the number of strict inclusions in any submodule chain of M(λ). Choose a finite chain of maximum possible length among these bounded integer lengths. If one factor were not simple, an intermediate submodule would refine it, contradicting maximality; thus this is a composition series. Taking a fixed weight is exact on these weight-module subquotients. Each occurrence of L(μ) contributes its one-dimensional highest-weight space in degree μ; other factors contribute a nonnegative dimension. Thus [M(λ):L(μ)]≤dim⁡M(λ)μ<∞.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources