How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Weyl Jacobian is independent and invariant
Statement
The Weyl Jacobian of a compact connected Lie group is independent of the choice of positive system and invariant under the action of the Weyl group on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume nothing beyond the standing hypotheses of the definition: is compact connected with maximal torus , its root system, and the Weyl Jacobian for a positive system .
A positive system is a set of the form for a regular ; it satisfies with , so for every root exactly one of is positive (Positive systems and simple roots, Roots of a compact connected Lie group).
For a root and one has , and the root is the character ; hence , a formula invariant under (Roots of a compact connected Lie group).
The Weyl group acts on by ; for the map is a Lie-group automorphism of , and acts on the root system by , so is a bijection of carrying positive systems to positive systems (Compact Weyl group, Roots of a compact connected Lie group, Conjugation and the adjoint representation of a Lie group).
Proof
For every and every root , step [L2] says the factor attached to equals , which is exactly the factor attached to , since .
Consequently , the product over the unordered pairs of opposite roots, because each pair contributes one factor to the product over any positive system by [L1] and the two possible choices give the same factor by step 1.1; this product does not mention , so is independent of the positive system.
Let and . Then , and by [L3] the set is a positive system of ; step 2.1 applied to this positive system shows .
Since was an arbitrary element of the normalizer, the invariance descends to , giving for every .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Brian Conrad and Aaron Landesman, Compact Lie Groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)