Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Weyl Jacobian is independent and invariant

Statement

The Weyl Jacobian J(t)=αΦ+1α(t)12 of a compact connected Lie group (G,T) is independent of the choice of positive system Φ+Φ(G,T) and invariant under the action of the Weyl group W(G,T) on T.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume nothing beyond the standing hypotheses of the definition: G is compact connected with maximal torus T, Φ(G,T) its root system, and J the Weyl Jacobian for a positive system Φ+.

[L1]

A positive system is a set of the form Φ+(v)={αΦ:(α,v)>0} for a regular v; it satisfies Φ=Φ+Φ with Φ=Φ+, so for every root α exactly one of α,α is positive (Positive systems and simple roots, Roots of a compact connected Lie group).

[L2]

For a root α and tT one has α(t)=1, and the root α is the character tα(t)1; hence 1α(t)12=(1α(t)1)(1α(t))=2α(t)α(t)1, a formula invariant under αα (Roots of a compact connected Lie group).

[L3]

The Weyl group W(G,T)=NG(T)/T acts on T by (gT)t=gtg1; for gNG(T) the map tgtg1 is a Lie-group automorphism of T, and g acts on the root system by Ad(g)gα=gαCg1, so ααCg1 is a bijection of Φ carrying positive systems to positive systems (Compact Weyl group, Roots of a compact connected Lie group, Conjugation and the adjoint representation of a Lie group).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every tT and every root α, step [L2] says the factor attached to α equals 2α(t)α(t)1, which is exactly the factor attached to α, since (α)(t)=α(t)1.

L1L2
2.1

Consequently αΦ+1α(t)12={α,α}(2α(t)α(t)1), the product over the unordered pairs of opposite roots, because each pair contributes one factor to the product over any positive system by [L1] and the two possible choices give the same factor by step 1.1; this product does not mention Φ+, so J is independent of the positive system.

L1step 1.1
3.1

Let gNG(T) and tT. Then J(gtg1)=αΦ+1(αCg)(t)12, and by [L3] the set {αCg:αΦ+} is a positive system of Φ; step 2.1 applied to this positive system shows J(gtg1)=J(t).

L3step 2.1
4.1

Since g was an arbitrary element of the normalizer, the invariance descends to W(G,T)=NG(T)/T, giving J(wt)=J(t) for every wW(G,T).

L3step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources