Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Choice and smallness ledger for the initial-object lemma, GAFT, and SAFT

The initial-object construction in A complete locally small category with a jointly weakly initial set has an initial object, without class-indexed choice forms a limit of a supplied small full subcategory and uses one existential witness for each fixed target. It does not choose arrows simultaneously over all targets.

The objectwise theorems General adjoint functor theorem, objectwise initial-object form and Special adjoint functor theorem, objectwise form with explicit intersection smallness or preservation data produce an initial comma object for one fixed ambient object. Their functor forms require a supplied family of those comma objects so that no proper-class selection is hidden in assembling the adjoint. Both SAFT branches require the functor to preserve all small limits, which is what makes the comma category complete; neither branch replaces that hypothesis. On top of it, the chosen-well-powered branch supplies representative sets for subobjects, while the direct branch assumes the relevant class intersections and their preservation explicitly, so that it never treats a proper class as a small diagram.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 39 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources