Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Convexity conventions, endpoint scope, dyadic approximation, and the exact use of the Axiom of Choice in the midpoint-convex counterexample

The continuity conclusion for a convex function is an interior conclusion: a convex function on a non-open interval need not have an endpoint derivative, and this development does not impose endpoint continuity beyond what a separate hypothesis supplies.

The midpoint-convex counterexample uses the Axiom of Choice exactly through the existence of a Hamel basis (The Axiom of Choice, Assuming the Axiom of Choice, R has a Hamel basis over Q: there is B⊆R such that every real is a finite Q-linear combination of elements of B in exactly one way, and each basis vector carries a well-defined Q-linear coefficient map). No choice principle is used in the dyadic induction or in the passage from continuous midpoint convexity to convexity.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources