Alphabeta Math
Remarkaudited 2026-09-01 sources checked 2026-09-01 not proved here
Recorded, not proved here. This statement is included so the library can refer to it honestly, with a citation to the literature. It is not proved anywhere in this library: the track that would prove it has not been developed here yet.

The dual of is ba(2N), the finitely additive charges

Statement

The dual of is isometrically isomorphic to ba(2N), the space of bounded finitely additive signed measures (charges) on the full power set of N, normed by total variation; the pairing sends μ to the functional xxdμ defined by the finitely additive integral.

Under this identification 1 is exactly the subspace of countably additive charges, a proper norm closed subspace of (). In particular (1)= but ()1, so 1 and are not reflexive.

Remarks

Not proved in this library. Recorded with a citation; both the finitely additive integral and the duality are outside the current stack.

What would prove it. Given φ(), define μ(A)=φ(1A) for AN; finite additivity is linearity, boundedness of the total variation is boundedness of φ, and the two operations invert each other because simple functions are dense in in the supremum norm.

Why it matters here. It is where the naive pattern "the dual of a sequence space is a sequence space" breaks. Every element of ()1 is produced by an extension argument and never by a formula, the Banach limits of Banach limits being the standard examples, so the failure of reflexivity for 1 is inseparable from the choice discussion in The set-theoretic cost of Hahn-Banach .

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources