How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dualizing real chain complexes requires an exactness argument
Statement
Let be a chain complex of real vector spaces, with and . Its real dual cochain complex has and .
Under AC, evaluation on cycles gives a natural isomorphism Consequently a real-linear chain map inducing homology isomorphisms in all degrees induces cohomology isomorphisms after real dualization.
In the separate branch ZF + DC plus the hypothesis that every subset of has the Baire property in its product topology, the acyclic complex in homological degrees , where , has nonzero real-dual cohomology in degree 2. Thus dualization does not preserve quasi-isomorphisms in this conditional setting. This is not a consistency or nonprovability theorem.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and separate axiom branches of the statement.
Under AC (The Axiom of Choice), a real-linear functional on a subspace extends to the containing vector space, by the basis construction in Dualizing real vector-space sequences and the choice boundary, proof 1.1. In that item's separate DC branch (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain), the functional on does not extend to .
Write , and . The square-zero identity implies . Cohomology is .
Proof
If is a cocycle, then for all , so vanishes on . Its restriction to therefore descends to . If is replaced by , its values on cycles are unchanged. Likewise replacing by leaves unchanged. Hence is well-defined and linear. This construction and these two representative checks use no choice.
Assume AC. Given , compose it with the quotient to obtain a functional on . By [F1] extend this to . It vanishes on , since its restriction to does, and hence is a cocycle. Its image under is . This proves surjectivity. The sole selection in this step is the functional extension furnished under AC.
If a cocycle class is sent to zero, its representative vanishes on . Define by . If , then , so ; thus b is well-defined. Applying this rule to sums and scalar multiples of any preimages proves linearity, without selecting a family of preimages. Extend to using [F1]. Then , so its class is zero. Conversely every coboundary vanishes on cycles, as already checked in step 1.1. This proves injectivity and both directions of the zero-class criterion.
Let be a real-linear chain map. Precomposition defines and commutes with coboundary, because . For a cocycle on D and a cycle on C, This proves naturality. If is an isomorphism, precomposition by it is an isomorphism of real duals, with inverse precomposition by its inverse. Steps 2.1 and 2.2 and this commuting identity show that is an isomorphism. No bases are chosen to define the canonical evaluation map or the naturality square.
In contrast to the AC conclusion of step 3.1, now assume only the DC and Baire-property hypotheses of the second branch. Put , , , with the inclusion, the quotient and every other group and differential zero. The composite is zero. The inclusion has zero kernel, the quotient has kernel E, and the quotient is surjective. It follows directly that , and all remaining homology groups vanish because their chain groups are zero. Thus the unique chain map is a quasi-isomorphism in every degree.
The dual complex in degrees is and its differential out of degree 2 is zero. Therefore By the second clause of [F1], the explicit functional is omitted from that image; its class in this quotient is nonzero. The dual of is , whose induced degree-2 map from zero cannot be surjective. This is a conditional real-vector-space example, with no change of coefficient field and no model-existence assertion.
The zero complex satisfies the positive assertion with the unique isomorphism in every degree. For a nonnegative complex, at degree zero ; the kernel case of step 2.2 gives directly, and no negative-degree extension is required. For a complex supported at one degree with group and zero differential, evaluation is the usual map and is the identity. The proof does not assume injective differentials or nonzero chain groups: all zero and repeated maps are governed by the displayed square-zero identity. The abstract conditional complex of step 4.1 is not asserted to be a singular chain complex of any space.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- DG-16 design; Hatcher/Park control (standard reference, not scraped)