Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated sources checked 2026-09-22 not proved here
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Recorded, not proved here. This statement is included so the library can refer to it honestly, with a citation to the literature. It is not proved anywhere in this library: the track that would prove it has not been developed here yet.

Nagata Cp theorem remains topological

Statement

For Tychonoff spaces X and Y, an isomorphism of topological rings Cp(X,R)Cp(Y,R), where Cp carries the topology of pointwise convergence inherited from RX and RY, implies XY.

This result is recorded, not proved here, and it is distinct from the ring-only description of the Stone–Čech compactification: the local Gelfand–Kolmogorov theorem identifies the maximal ideals of C(X,R) set-theoretically with the points of βX and detects which of those ideals are fixed (Gelfand-Kolmogorov for rings of continuous functions), but does not assert that the ring alone reconstructs the topology of βX. Nagata's theorem instead includes the pointwise topology as part of the data and recovers X itself. The catalogue target is Nagata's theorem: the topological ring Cp(X) determines X , and it stays a Recorded result.

Remarks

  • Orientation only. No item on this page depends on this statement; it is not a supplier, and it is excluded from every proof path.
  • Open obligation for the catalogue. Full-text verification of the exact statement, hypotheses and the pointwise-topology convention is an open repair obligation on the catalogue target, not a fact established here.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources