How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The argument principle recovers the open mapping theorem
Remark
If is nonconstant and holomorphic on a complex domain and , then has a zero of positive multiplicity at . Choose a small circle around on which does not vanish. The preimage-count corollary says that for every sufficiently close to the function has the same positive number of zeros inside that circle. So every value near is attained nearby, and the image is open.
This reproduces the already-published open mapping theorem Open mapping theorem for holomorphic functions. The earlier page keeps its local-normal-form proof because the reading order needs that theorem before the argument principle exists.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, §5.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. W. Howell and J. H. Mathews, Complex Analysis, §8.7 (standard reference, not scraped)