How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Royden's classical Vitali-covering proof is a third route and is not run on this page
Remark
There is a third classical proof that monotone functions are differentiable almost everywhere. One first proves measurability of the Dini derivative level sets, then applies the Vitali covering theorem to the sets where the upper and lower derived numbers disagree.
This page does not run that route. The rising-sun proof and the Lebesgue-Stieltjes proof already expose the mathematical comparison the design wanted:
- the rising-sun route reaches the theorem without the Vitali covering theorem;
- the measure route factors the result through differentiation of measures and the Stieltjes correspondence;
- the Vitali route is historically important, but it duplicates the almost-everywhere differentiability conclusion without adding a later dependency that this page needs.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- H. L. Royden and P. Fitzpatrick, Real Analysis, monotone differentiation proof (standard reference, not scraped)