Shelah 1984: the inaccessible is needed for measurability, not for the Baire property
Statement
Shelah (1984) settles which half of Solovay's model: ZF + DC with every set of reals measurable ‡ really needs a large cardinal.
If ZF is consistent, then so is ZF + DC + "every set of reals has the Baire property". No inaccessible cardinal is required for this half.
The measurability half is different. If ZF + DC + "every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable" is consistent, then so is ZFC + "there exists an inaccessible cardinal". So the large-cardinal hypothesis in Solovay's theorem is not an artefact of the proof: the two theories are equiconsistent, and the inaccessible cannot be removed.
Remarks
-
Not proved in this library. Neither direction is proved here. The second direction in particular is a reverse-mathematical calculation about consistency strength, of a kind this library has no machinery for.
-
What would prove it. For the first direction, an amalgamated Souslin forcing replacing the Levy collapse. For the second, the observation that if every set of reals is measurable then is inaccessible in for every real , which needs the fine structure of the constructible universe relativised to a real. Both belong to a forcing and inner-model track that this library does not contain.
-
Why it matters here. It sharpens the reading of Solovay's model: ZF + DC with every set of reals measurable ‡ in a way that matters for how the library reports costs. "Every set of reals has the Baire property" is consistent with ZF + DC at no extra consistency cost at all, so any Baire-category pathology on that this library later produces must be using more than DC. Measurability pathologies sit strictly higher. When The choice ledger: what costs the Axiom of Choice and what does not ↗ records what a theorem costs, this is the result that keeps the two cases apart.
-
Conditional discipline. The first clause is relative to Con(ZF); the second is an implication between consistency statements and is not an assertion that an inaccessible cardinal exists.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 3 results over 3 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Shelah, Can you take Solovay's inaccessible away?, Israel J. Math. 48 (1984), 1-47 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Solovay model (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)