How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The sine-period arc-length integrand has no elementary antiderivative
The reduction in The arc length of one sine period is is exact: the sine-period length is . What is not proved here is the differential-algebraic statement behind the word elliptic. For a nondegenerate modulus , the integrand
has no elementary antiderivative. In particular is nondegenerate, so the displayed arc-length integral is not reducible by an elementary antiderivative.
A local proof would require Liouville's theorem on elementary antiderivatives or equivalent differential algebra. That machinery is not among this development's prerequisites, so the non-elementarity assertion is recorded from Hall's treatment rather than presented as locally proved.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. M. Hall, Special Functions, §3.1, Example 3.1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)