How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Strictification gives equivalence, not on-the-nose identification
Remark
Mac Lane strictification proves that every monoidal category is equivalent to a strict one, not that it is already strict after a harmless renaming of objects. This is exactly the distinction highlighted by Isbell's warning that isomorphic objects cannot simply be identified: forcing specified isomorphisms to become identities can change the category.
The same boundary also separates strictness from skeletality. A skeletal category is one in which isomorphic objects are equal; a skeleton of a given category is a full skeletal subcategory obtained by choosing one representative from each isomorphism class. Strictification instead builds an equivalent monoidal category functorially from the original one. Passing to a skeleton and strictifying are different operations, and they need not be achievable simultaneously.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Remarks 2.8.6 and 2.8.7 (standard reference, not scraped)